Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences ; 18(1):61-64, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2238448

ABSTRACT

Background: Critically ill COVID-19 patients have an elevated risk of experiencing hypercoagulable conditions. Currently, many COVID-19 patients have been administered anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapies to lower the risk of systematic thrombosis. Iliopsoas hematoma is a potentially fatal and rare complication of bleeding disorders or anticoagulation therapy which sometimes grows to become clinically significant. The main purpose of this case review is to emphasize the importance of diagnosing iliopsoas hematomas and the possibility of antiplatelet contribution to its development. Case Presentation: We are reporting a rare presentation of non-traumatic iliopsoas hematoma in a non-anticoagulated patient. The patient is a 59-year-old male, with known type-2 diabetes, on oral hypoglycemic medications, 3-weeks post-COVID-19. He had started aspirin 81 mg orally, once daily, to prevent thrombotic events associated with COVID 19 infection, with no anticoagulant use and no other medications. He came in through the ED, presenting with two weeks history of progressive right lower limb weakness in which an iliopsoas hematoma diagnosis was confirmed based on radiological investigation. Conclusion: The possibility of iliopsoas hematoma should be considered in non-anticoagulated patients with no inherited or acquired coagulation disorders presenting with limb weakness. The link between antiplatelet use in a COVID-19 patient and the development of soft tissue bleeding (e.g., iliopsoas hematoma) must be studied further. © 2022 [The Author/The Authors]

3.
American Journal of Transplantation ; 22(Supplement 3):875-876, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2063548

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics of serologic non-responders to COVID-19 booster vaccination in a cohort of solid organ transplant recipients. Method(s): All solid organ transplant recipients our center who received COVID-19 booster vaccination and had SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG antibodies checked at least 4 weeks after the dose were included. We evaluated the patients who were found to have negative SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG antibodies despite booster vaccination (i.e. serologic non-responders). Result(s): Among 657 solid organ transplant patients who had received a booster COVID-19 vaccination, 168 patients had Spike IgG antibodies checked during the study period. Forty-nine patients (29.2%) were found to be seronegative and were included in the analysis. 69% were male with a median age of 60 years. The majority of the cohort (47%) were kidney transplant recipients who had received primary vaccination series at a median of 206 days post-transplant. 65% had received basiliximab for induction immunosuppression. Most of the patients (65%) received primary vaccination with Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and 67% received Pfizer COVID-19 booster vaccination at a median of 187 days after primary vaccination series. Spike IgG antibodies were checked at a median of 41 days from booster vaccination. No patients received rATG within 90 days of booster administration. Similarly, no patients received high dose (>250mg methylprednisolone equivalent) steroids within 30 days prior to booster vaccination. For immunosuppression, 27% were maintained on belatacept and 82% were on anti-metabolites at the time of the booster vacciantion. Ten patients (20%) experienced a COVID-19 infection postcompletion of their booster vaccination. Conclusion(s): In our solid organ transplant cohort, the majority of serologic nonresponders underwent basiliximab induction and were on an antimetabolite for maintenance immunosuppression. A limitation of our study was the use of different laboratory assays for determining IgG levels. Future work includes evaluating the clinical characteristics of COVID 19 booster serologic responders and comparing the two populations. (Table Presented).

4.
American Journal of Transplantation ; 22(Supplement 3):948, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2063503

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Currently there are no UNOS guidelines regarding the selection criteria required for simultaneous heart-kidney transplant recipients (SHKT). As of 2018 our center has begun performing these dual transplants for appropriate candidates. We report on the criteria devised to guide SHKT candidate selection at our institution and the subsequent clinical outcomes. Method(s): This is a single center, retrospective study of 26 patients who received SHKT at our institution from Dec 2018 to Oct 2021. A multidisciplinary team composed of heart and kidney transplant medical and surgical members determined appropriate recipient-donor SHKT candidate pairs. Selection criteria for SHKT was established by our kidney transplant group and included an evaluation for chronic kidney disease (CKD) or evidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) with a prolonged course or requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). The surgery was conducted according to our institution's standardized protocols. The majority of patients received IL2-RA and methylprednisolone induction therapy, and all patients received triple immunosuppression therapy with prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Adjustments in long term therapy were made in collaboration between the heart and kidney transplant teams. Result(s): From Dec 2018 to Oct 2021, 26 patients underwent SHKT at our institution. 24 patients (92%) carried a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) as defined as an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 for at least 90 days on at least two separate tests. Clinical risk factors for CKD, the presence of proteinuria, and renal imaging data were also taken into consideration when determining a diagnosis of CKD. Two patients (8%) carried a diagnosis of stage III AKI for at least 4 weeks and required renal replacement therapy during their hospital course. Of our 26 patients, one patient received a DCD donor and 12 patients (46%) received hepatitis C donors. 25 patients (96%) received induction therapy with IL2-RA. During the first 3 months post-transplant, the only patient who received ATG had 7 severe infections;11 patients (44%) and 13 patients (52%) who received IL2 -RA had no infections and <= 4 mild infections, respectively. One patient died due to COVID 19 pneumonia complicated by multisystem organ failure. For a median follow up period of 410 (187-707) days, 8% patients in the IL2-RA induction cohort experienced a 2R/3A heart rejection, 8% patients remained on HD due to primary kidney graft nonfunction, and the survival rate was 96%. Conclusion(s): UNOS guidelines regarding selection criteria for SHKT are an important next step in the care of heart transplant candidates with kidney disease, particularly as the number of SHKT performed yearly increase. Compared to the literature, our data supports the use of standardized criteria for SHKT selection and the use of IL2- RA as an induction strategy with excellent patient survival.

5.
American Journal of Transplantation ; 22(Supplement 3):1035, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2063413

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Evolving data suggests booster vaccine doses enhance the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients with higher IgG responses, neutralizing antibodies titers, and greater SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell counts. Currently, there is no recommended framework for monitoring potential vaccine-related immunological graft injury. Here, we describe kinetics of dd-cfDNA pre- and post-booster vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Method(s): Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify KTRs that received a SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine dose in 2021 and were monitored with dd-cfDNA pre- and post-vaccination. dd-cfDNA was collected as part of standard of care assessment. Pre-booster dd-cfDNA levels were defined as the most recent result prior to booster administration. Post-vaccination results were collected up to 30 days post-booster administration. Result(s): 116 KTRs were identified for analysis. Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. Median time from transplant to SARS-CoV-2 booster administration was 463 days (IQR 333-787.25, Table 1). Pre-booster dd-cfDNA levels were established a median of 9 days (IQR 2.25 - 16) pre-booster. The median level of dd-cfDNA pre-booster was 0.17% (IQR 0.12% - 0.25%). There was no significant difference in median levels of dd-cfDNA up to 30 days post-booster administration (Kruskal Wallis test with multiple comparisons, all p values >0.99, Figure 1). No adverse clinical events or acute rejection episodes were reported within 30 days of SARS-CoV-2 booster administration in this cohort. Conclusion(s): Median dd-cfDNA levels were not impacted by SARS-CoV-2 booster administration, suggesting that patterns of subclinical injury that may potentiate inflammation, allosensitization or allograft rejection are unlikely in this setting. The stability of dd-cfDNA demonstrated here further reinforces the safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster administration in KTRs.

6.
Policy Research Working Paper - World Bank|2021. (9508):35 pp. 25 ref. ; 2021.
Article in English | CAB Abstracts | ID: covidwho-1848595

ABSTRACT

This paper studies the trade effects of Covid-19 using monthly disaggregated trade data for 28 countries and multiple trading partners from the beginning of the pandemic to June 2020. Regression results based on a sector-level gravity model show that the negative trade effects induced by Covid-19 shocks varied widely across sectors. Sectors more amenable to remote work contracted less throughout the pandemic. Importantly, participation in global value chains increased traders' vulnerability to shocks suffered by trading partners, but it also reduced their vulnerability to domestic shocks.

7.
Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation ; 41(4):S209-S209, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1783398

ABSTRACT

SRTR data currently suggests that induction therapy in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) with rabbit antithymoglobulin (ATG) provides survival advantage compared to interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA). We are reporting the outcomes of recipients with SHKT treated with IL2-RA as induction therapy. This is a single center, retrospective study of 26 patients who received SHKT at our institution from Dec 2018 to Oct 2021. A multidisciplinary team composed of heart and kidney transplant medical and surgical members determined appropriate recipient-donor SHKT candidate pairs. The majority of patients received IL2-RA induction therapy, and all patients received triple immunosuppression therapy with prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Adjustments in long term therapy were made in collaboration between the heart and kidney transplant teams. From Dec 2018 to Oct 2021, 26 patients underwent SHKT. 23 patients (88%) were male, the median age was 57 years, and 5.4% were ≥ 65 years. 18 patients (69%) had non ischemic cardiomyopathy and 24 patients (92%) had CKD (mean GFR ≤ 35%). 18 patients were listed Status 2 and 2 patient Status 5. One patient received a DCD donor and 12 patients (46%) received hep C donors. 25 patients (96%) received induction therapy with IL2-RA. During the first 3 months post-transplant, the only patient who received ATG had 7 severe infections;11 patients (44%) and 13 patients (52%) who received IL2 -RA had no infections and ≤ 4 mild infections, respectively. One patient died due to COVID 19 pneumonia complicated by multisystem organ failure. For a median follow up period of 410 (187-707) days, 8% patients in the IL2-RA induction cohort experienced a 2R/3A heart rejection, 8% patients remained on HD due to primary kidney graft non-function, and the survival rate was 96%. Compared with present literature, our data support the use of IL2- RA as an induction strategy in SHKT with excellent patient survival. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL